Navigating the Complex Intersection of Doctoral Degree Requirements: Results from a Qualitative Analysis

Authors

  • Farooq Ahmad Department of Educational Research & Assessment, University of Okara
  • Syed Abdul Waheed Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara
  • Nadia Gilani Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara

Keywords:

Faculty conflicts, publication, professional conflicts, research evaluators, doctoral candidates, doctoral supervisors

Abstract

This qualitative study explores the multifaceted dynamics within higher education institutions (HEIs) in Pakistan, focusing on doctoral candidates’ experiences of addressing degree requirements. To gain their comprehensive and rich insights, the researchers conducted in-depth interviews with purposively selected twenty doctoral students and organized three focus groups, involving a total of 33 participants. Through thematic analysis, three key themes emerged that intertwine to shape the doctoral experiences including mandatory publication requirement for doctoral degree completion, personal and professional conflicts among faculty members and the effect of evaluators’ situations on theses reviewing and completion. The results revealed that mandatory publication of the research paper, personal and professional conflicts among the faculty and administration, and challenges in reviewing the dissertation from international evaluators shape the dynamics of doctoral degree completion that hamper the doctoral journey. By connecting these themes, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the complex intersection of doctoral degree requirements offering valuable insights for academic institutions seeking to enhance the doctoral experience and improve program quality and degree completion.

Author Biographies

Farooq Ahmad, Department of Educational Research & Assessment, University of Okara

PhD Scholar (Education), Department of Educational Research & Assessment, University of Okara

Syed Abdul Waheed, Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara

Assistant Professor & Head, Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara

Nadia Gilani, Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara

Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara

References

Ahmad, F., Waheed, S. A., & Gilani, N. (2023a). Procedural requirements: Storied experiences of doctoral students after submission of dissertation. Journal of Education Humanities Research, University of Balochistan, Quetta, 15(1), 136-146.

Ahmad, F., Waheed, S. A., & Gilani, N. (2023b). Unveiling Procrastination and Anxiety: University Administration and Supervisory Role in Addressing Post-Submission Challenges faced by Doctoral Candidates. Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 3(2), 16-33.

Ahmad, F., Waheed, S. A., & Gilani, N. (2025). Post-Submission Dilemma: A qualitative Analysis of Doctoral Candidates’ Health Worries and Missing Job Opportunities due to Delayed PhD Degrees. Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 11-22.

Akparep, J. Y., Jengre, E., & Amoah, D. A. (2017). Demystifying the blame game in the delays of graduation of research students in Universities in Ghana: The case of University for Development Studies. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 5(1), 34-50.

Almoustapha, O. S., & Uddin, M. R. (2017). Factors influencing the degree progress of international PhD students from Africa: An exploratory study. Üniversitepark Bülten, 6(1), 79.

Antonelli, J., Jones, S. J., Burridge, A. B., & Hawkins, J. (2020). Understanding the self-regulated learning characteristics of first-generation college students. Jounal of College Student Development, 61(1), 67-83.

Axelby, R., Worku‐Dix, B., & Crewe, E. (2022). Global partnerships on paper and in practice: Critical observations from inside a Global Challenge Research Fund capacity‐development project. Journal of International Development, 34(8), 1496-1508.

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., . . . Honeychurch, S. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1).

Brenner, L., Gutierrez, P., Cornette, M., Betthauser, L., Bahraini, N., & Staves, P. (2008). A qualitative study of potential suicide risk factors in returning combat veterans. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(3), 211-225.

Byun, K., Jon, J.-E., & Kim, D. (2013). Quest for building world-class universities in South Korea: Outcomes and consequences. Higher Education, 65, 645-659.

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. sage Publications.

Chiang, K. H. (2003). Learning experiences of doctoral students in UK universities. International journal of sociology and social policy.

Coates, T.-N. (2015). Between the world and me. Text publishing.

Cotterall, S. (2013). More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research Development, 32(2), 174-187.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. The foundations of social research 1-256

Crotty, M. (2004). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Davis, D. (2018). Students’ perceptions of supervisory qualities: What do students want? What do they believe they receive? International Journal of Doctoral Studies.

De Welde, K., & Laursen, S. (2011). The glass obstacle course: Informal and formal barriers for women Ph. D. students in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender, Science Technology, 3(3), 571-595.

De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. In Higher Education in the Next Decade (pp. 303-325). Brill.

El-Ghoroury, H. N., Galper, DI, Sawaqdeh, A., & Bufka, LF. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122-134.

England, P., Levine, A., & Mishel, E. (2020). Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13), 6990-6997.

Ezzy, D. (2013). Qualitative analysis. Routledge.

Fang, D., & Zhan, L. (2021). Completion and attrition of nursing PhD students of the 2001 to 2010 matriculating cohorts. Nursing Outlook, 69(3), 340-349.

Fetene, G. T., & Tamrat, W. (2021). The PhD journey at Addis Ababa University: Study delays, causes and coping mechanisms. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 319.

Files, L. B., Meiners, R. E., & Morriss, A. P. (2021). Corruption in university admissions and the administrative allocation of scarce goods. BYU L. Rev., 47, 1.

Gearity, B. T., & Mertz, N. (2012). From" bitch" to" mentor": A doctoral student's story of self-change and mentoring. The Qualitative Report, 17(30), 1.

Geven, K., Skopek, J., & Triventi, M. (2018). How to increase PhD completion rates? An impact evaluation of two reforms in a selective graduate school, 1976–2012. Research in higher education, 59(5), 529-552.

Golde, C. M. (1998). Beginning Graduate School: Explaining First-Year Doctoral Attrition. New directions for higher education, 101, 55-64.

Golde, C. M. (2005). The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(6), 669-700.

Grant, J. (2021). The new power university: The social purpose of higher education in the 21st century. Pearson UK.

Harshé, R. (2022). 8 Managing a university in transition Opportunities and challenges. Reclaiming Public Universities: Comparative Reflections for Reforms.

Hernández-González, V., De Pano-Rodríguez, A., & Reverter-Masia, J. (2020). Spanish doctoral theses in physical activity and sports sciences and authors’ scientific publications (LUSTRUM 2013–2017). Scientometrics, 122, 661-679.

Ishimaru, A. M., Barajas-López, F., Sun, M., Scarlett, K., & Anderson, E. (2022). Transforming the role of RPPs in remaking educational systems. Educational Researcher, 51(7), 465-473.

Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph. D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535-555.

Japheth, N., Namubiru Ssentamu, P., Kyalo Wambua, B., & Jepkoech Kurgat, S. (2023). Strategies Used for Effective Research Supervision in the Completion of Postgraduate Studies in Selected Universities of Uganda. Journal of National Council for Higher Education, 10(2).

Jongbloed, B., & Vossensteyn, H. (2001). Keeping up performances: An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education. Journal of higher education policy management, 23(2), 127-145.

King, M. F. (2008). Ph. D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline demographic data from the Ph. D. completion project. Nicholson.

Lei, S. A., & Chuang, N.-K. (2009). Research Collaboration and Publication During Graduate Studies: Evaluating Benefits And Costs From Students'perspectives. College Student Journal, 43(4).

Leijen, Ä., Lepp, L., & Remmik, M. (2016). Why did I drop out? Former students’ recollections about their study process and factors related to leaving the doctoral studies. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(2), 129-144.

Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods. Second. Melbourne: Oxford university press.

Lin, Y.-N. (2012). Life experiences of dissatisfied science and engineering graduate students in Taiwan. College Student Journal, 46(1).

Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218-231.

Lovitts, B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325.

Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education Research, 2(1), 9-20.

McAlpine, L., & McKinnon, M. (2013). Supervision–the most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265-280.

Miller, A. M. (2013). Timely doctoral completion rates in five fields: A two-part study. University of South Florida.

Miller, C. W., Zwickl, B. M., Posselt, J. R., Silvestrini, R. T., & Hodapp, T. (2019). Typical physics Ph. D. admissions criteria limit access to underrepresented groups but fail to predict doctoral completion. Science Advances, 5(1), eaat7550.

Mills, D., & Inouye, K. (2021). Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 89-104.

Monks, H., Costello, L., Dare, J., & Reid Boyd, E. (2021). “We’re continually comparing ourselves to something”: Navigating body image, media, and social media ideals at the nexus of appearance, health, and wellness. Journal of Sex Roles, 84, 221-237.

Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The role of universities in social innovation within quadruple/quintuple helix model: Practical implications from polish experience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2230-2271.

Morgan, G. (1979). Response to Mintzberg. In (pp. 137-139): JSTOR Administrative Science Quarterly.

Mosanya, A. U., Ukoha-Kalu, B. O., Isah, A., Umeh, I., Amorha, K. C., Ayogu, E. E., & Ubaka, C. (2022). Factors associated with the timely completion of doctoral research studies in clinical pharmacy: A mixed-methods study. Plos one, 17(9), e0274638.

Noel, J., Wambua, B., & Ssentamu, P. (2020). Invest in research supervision, enhance timely completion of postgraduate studies. RMC Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(1), 47-59.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Pauley, R., Cunningham, M., & Toth, P. (1999). Doctoral student attrition and retention: A study of a non-traditional Ed. D. program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 1(3), 225-238.

Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students' problems and well-being. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012.

Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publcations.

Shorey, S., & Ng, E. D. (2022). Examining characteristics of descriptive phenomenological nursing studies: A scoping review. Journal of advanced nursing, 78(7), 1968-1979.

Tschisgale, P., Wulff, P., & Kubsch, M. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence-based methods into qualitative research in physics education research: A case for computational grounded theory. Journal of Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020123.

Tuma, T. T., Adams, J. D., Hultquist, B. C., & Dolan, E. L. (2021). The dark side of development: A systems characterization of the negative mentoring experiences of doctoral students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar16.

Van de Schoot, R., Yerkes, M. A., Mouw, J. M., & Sonneveld, H. (2013). What took them so long? Explaining PhD delays among doctoral candidates. Plos one, 8(7), e68839.

van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2021). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: the importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 48-67.

Waheed, S. A., Gilani, N., Raza, M., & Ahmad, F. (2021). The beginning of more worries: Doctoral candidates’ untold stories after submission of dissertation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 537366.

Wollast, R., Aelenei, C., Chevalère, J., Van der Linden, N., Galand, B., Azzi, A., . . . Klein, O. (2023). Facing the dropout crisis among PhD candidates: the role of supervisor support in emotional well-being and intended doctoral persistence among men and women. Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 813-828.

Woolderink, M., Putnik, K., van der Boom, H., & Klabbers, G. (2015). The voice of PhD candidates and PhD supervisors. A qualitative exploratory study amongst PhD candidates and supervisors to evaluate the relational aspects of PhD supervision in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 217.

Published

03-12-2025

How to Cite

Ahmad, F., Waheed, S. A., & Gilani, N. (2025). Navigating the Complex Intersection of Doctoral Degree Requirements: Results from a Qualitative Analysis. Bulletin of Education and Research, 47(1), 11–35. Retrieved from https://ber.pu.edu.pk/jo/index.php/ber/article/view/299

Issue

Section

Articles